<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>自进化 on MessageDaily</title><link>https://inkeast.github.io/MessageDaily/tags/%E8%87%AA%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96/</link><description>Recent content in 自进化 on MessageDaily</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-cn</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://inkeast.github.io/MessageDaily/tags/%E8%87%AA%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>HarnessEvo 精读：Harness 自进化的价值藏在控制槽位里</title><link>https://inkeast.github.io/MessageDaily/posts/2026-09-05-harnessevo-value-localization-paper-reading/</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inkeast.github.io/MessageDaily/posts/2026-09-05-harnessevo-value-localization-paper-reading/</guid><description>HarnessEvo 把 Agent harness 分解为 role/strategy/format/control 四个可独立进化的槽位，用 leave-one-in/out 协议做价值归因：整体指标&amp;rsquo;看似无效&amp;rsquo;（0.657 vs 0.642），但收益完全 localized 于 reflection/control 槽位（+0.119, p=0.0046）；等预算下多槽位同进反而互相稀释——预算分摊陷阱。本文基于全文阅读拆解其归因协议与对自进化领域的方法论警示。</description></item></channel></rss>